<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>435 Digital &#187; Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://435digital.com/blog/tag/bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://435digital.com</link>
	<description>435 Digital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:15:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bing It Down A Notch: Does Bing Really Beat Google 2:1?</title>
		<link>http://435digital.com/blog/2012/10/09/bing-it-down-a-notch-does-bing-really-beat-google-21/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bing-it-down-a-notch-does-bing-really-beat-google-21</link>
		<comments>http://435digital.com/blog/2012/10/09/bing-it-down-a-notch-does-bing-really-beat-google-21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Funk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://435digital.com/?p=7075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160; There&#8217;s no question that when it comes to their search engine Bing, Microsoft can use all the positive attention it can get. Launched in 2009, Bing was supposed to take the search world by storm. Labeling itself a &#8220;decision engine&#8221;, Microsoft was hoping to upend Google as the hip, go-to search engine for a</p><p>The post <a href="http://435digital.com/blog/2012/10/09/bing-it-down-a-notch-does-bing-really-beat-google-21/">Bing It Down A Notch: Does Bing Really Beat Google 2:1?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://435digital.com">435 Digital</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no question that when it comes to their search engine Bing, Microsoft can use all the positive attention it can get.
</p>
<p>Launched in 2009, Bing was supposed to take the search world by storm. Labeling itself a &#8220;decision engine&#8221;, Microsoft was hoping to upend Google as the hip, go-to search engine for a younger demographic. It suggested detailed &#8220;You may also like&#8230;&#8221; alternate searches! It let you share to Facebook! It&#8230;had awesome graphics and pictures on the homepage?</p>
<p>
So what happened? While it&#8217;s hard to say that Bing flopped, it definitely stumbled out of the gate. It was the Zune to Google&#8217;s iPod, the Betamax to Google&#8217;s VHS. Sure, it worked&#8230;but why would you switch over to it when a superior product that you&#8217;ve been using for years wasn&#8217;t broken?</p>
<p>
Trying to put all subsequent versions of Bing (and its predecessors MSN Search and the <em>awful</em> Windows Live Search) in its rearview, Microsoft has revamped Bing and is currently pushing out a huge marketing effort to garner attention, again targeting a younger crowd.</p>
<p>
<iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nBriUtZ55ho?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" width="640" height="360"></iframe></p>
<p>
Bing vs Google in a blind results test? Literally losing the shirt off your back? In California, Google&#8217;s own back yard? All of these things pale in comparison to the fact that Microsoft is claiming that, in their blind test, they&#8217;re beating Google&#8217;s results almost 2:1.</p>
<p>
I don&#8217;t doubt this is true. But I also don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a fair fight.</p>
<p>
Microsoft has set up a webpage for everyday internet citizens to take the test. And when I did, I noticed a lot of factors that may tip the scales in Bing&#8217;s favor instead of staging this competition as a fair fight. You can take the test yourself at <a title="Bing It On" href="http://www.bingiton.com/Landingpage.aspx?form=&amp;publ=&amp;crea=" target="_blank">Bing It On</a>.</p>
<p>
Here are a few stray thoughts and observations:</p>
<p>
Bing is up front with the fact that their blind search engine results are stripping out all ads on each result. This includes all paid search ads, but also takes out Google&#8217;s shopping results. And yet, Bing&#8217;s shopping results <em>are</em> included in their search result. This may not seem like a huge difference, but see for yourself how just a few pictures can make one side of the blind test stand out over the other. That&#8217;s Google on the left and Bing on the right. Notice a difference? Why did Bing allow its own shopping results into the test while excluding Google&#8217;s?</p>
<p><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://435digital.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Bing-Google.jpg"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-14398" title="Bing Challenge Result" src="http://435digital.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Bing-Google-1024x385.jpg" alt="" width="717" height="270" /></a></div>
<p>
<span style="text-align: center;">I did an informal poll around the office, and 40% of my coworkers said that if they were taking the Bing/Google challenge, they would search for some kind of product. If this is true of most people that have taken this test worldwide, that means that in almost half of the test cases, Bing has set itself up with an unfair advantage by showing their shopping results while excluding Google&#8217;s.</span></p>
<p>
Another 40% of those I surveyed said they would search for a keyword that was location-based. And guess what? Bing is also excluding all Google Maps/Places graphics from their side-by-side results as well. Since Google&#8217;s results page is optimized and laid out to look better when that location information is displayed, completely eliminating it makes their result look junky and poorly laid out. In other words, Bing is eliminating a HUGE piece of Google&#8217;s location-based searches in this test, which makes Google&#8217;s results look terrible. So in my unofficial office study, we&#8217;re now up to 80% of searches that Bing has significantly given their results a leg up in a side-by-side comparison.</p>
<p>
If you take the Bing It On challenge, one thing you&#8217;ll realize is how hard Bing is trying to make itself look like Google. Even I was amazed sometimes when I thought I was clicking on the Google result as being superior and finding out it was actually Bing. And I work with these search engines every day! So instead of trying something new and different when it comes to search, Bing seems to be trying really hard to out-Google Google. And if that&#8217;s their end goal, I wish them all the luck in the world, because that&#8217;s a tough mountain to climb. If you don&#8217;t believe me, ask Jeeves. Or should I say &#8216;ask Ask Jeeves&#8217;?</p>
<p>
The bottom line is that even if you throw out everything I&#8217;ve mentioned above and brand me as biased against the Little Decision Engine That Could, it doesn&#8217;t change the fact that Bing does not beat Google 2:1 in the ways that immediately pop into your mind when you hear that statistic. In this (in my opinion, slightly biased) Bing It On competition, users on the street may indeed pick the Bing search results over Google 2:1, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that Bing has any chance over the next few years to surpass Google in traffic or popularity. Google is built into more of our phones and tablets. Google still has more of the search market covered than every other search engine combined, and it&#8217;s not even close.</p>
<p>
Maybe Bing will find a place in the marketplace for themselves and thrive as a niche search engine for specific types of demographics. But they have a long way to go for &#8220;I should Bing that&#8221; to start rolling off the tongue as easily as &#8220;I should Google that&#8221; does. And while flashy campaigns like the Bing It On test seem like a good way to grab attention, some of their claims don&#8217;t seem to hold up under closer inspection.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://435digital.com/blog/2012/10/09/bing-it-down-a-notch-does-bing-really-beat-google-21/">Bing It Down A Notch: Does Bing Really Beat Google 2:1?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://435digital.com">435 Digital</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://435digital.com/blog/2012/10/09/bing-it-down-a-notch-does-bing-really-beat-google-21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flickr: SEO for photos from &#8217;30 Second Social&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://435digital.com/blog/2012/02/10/flickr-seo-photo/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=flickr-seo-photo</link>
		<comments>http://435digital.com/blog/2012/02/10/flickr-seo-photo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AmyGuth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#30secsocial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 second social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Guth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott kleinberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://435digital.com/?p=6655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On Flickr, SEO can be improved many ways. By optimizing each photo, users improve their visibility in search engines such as Google, Bing and Yahoo. In this episode of &#8220;30 Second Social,&#8221; Amy Guth explains simple ways to make your Flickr photos more visible to search engines. Flickr: how to optimize photos for search engines</p><p>The post <a href="http://435digital.com/blog/2012/02/10/flickr-seo-photo/">Flickr: SEO for photos from &#8217;30 Second Social&#8217;</a> appeared first on <a href="http://435digital.com">435 Digital</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Flickr, SEO can be improved many ways. By optimizing each photo, users improve their visibility in search engines such as Google, Bing and Yahoo.</p>
<p>In this episode of &#8220;30 Second Social,&#8221; Amy Guth explains simple ways to make your Flickr photos more visible to search engines.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/videogallery/66822978/Technology/Optimizing-Flickr-SEO-Value-30SecSocial">Flickr: how to optimize photos for search engines</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://435digital.com/blog/2012/02/10/flickr-seo-photo/">Flickr: SEO for photos from &#8217;30 Second Social&#8217;</a> appeared first on <a href="http://435digital.com">435 Digital</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://435digital.com/blog/2012/02/10/flickr-seo-photo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter: Search engine optimization with Twitter bio keywords from &#8217;30 Second Social&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://435digital.com/blog/2012/01/13/twitter-seo/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=twitter-seo</link>
		<comments>http://435digital.com/blog/2012/01/13/twitter-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scottk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#30secsocial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 second social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Guth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott kleinberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://435digital.com/?p=6671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On Twitter, one easy and proven way to boost search engine optimization is to write a proper bio. When edited correctly with keywords up front, Twitter SEO is greatly improved. In this episode of “30 Second Social,” Amy Guth explains how easy this is. Twitter: Search engine optimization with Twitter bio keywords</p><p>The post <a href="http://435digital.com/blog/2012/01/13/twitter-seo/">Twitter: Search engine optimization with Twitter bio keywords from &#8217;30 Second Social&#8217;</a> appeared first on <a href="http://435digital.com">435 Digital</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Twitter, one easy and proven way to boost search engine optimization is to write a proper bio. When edited correctly with keywords up front, Twitter SEO is greatly improved. In this episode of “30 Second Social,” Amy Guth explains how easy this is.</p>
<p><a href="http://tv.chicagotribune.com/2012/twitter-search-engine-optimization-seo-keywords/" target="_blank">Twitter: Search engine optimization with Twitter bio keywords</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://435digital.com/blog/2012/01/13/twitter-seo/">Twitter: Search engine optimization with Twitter bio keywords from &#8217;30 Second Social&#8217;</a> appeared first on <a href="http://435digital.com">435 Digital</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://435digital.com/blog/2012/01/13/twitter-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Explaining SEO in Plain English</title>
		<link>http://435digital.com/blog/2010/09/07/seo-uh-what-are-you-talking-about/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=seo-uh-what-are-you-talking-about</link>
		<comments>http://435digital.com/blog/2010/09/07/seo-uh-what-are-you-talking-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>435 Digital</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://435digital.com/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Many businesses (in fact many people) have no idea what Search Engine Optimization is. So here is my explanation what it is: Google (or if you prefer Yahoo!, Bing! and ::sigh:: AOL) is the new phone book. It’s where users go to find businesses. Instead of flipping through a heavy-crinkly brick of pages to find</p><p>The post <a href="http://435digital.com/blog/2010/09/07/seo-uh-what-are-you-talking-about/">Explaining SEO in Plain English</a> appeared first on <a href="http://435digital.com">435 Digital</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many businesses (in fact many people) have no idea what Search Engine Optimization is.</p>
<p>So here is my explanation what it is:</p>
<p><span id="more-447"></span><br />
Google (or if you prefer Yahoo!, Bing! and ::sigh:: AOL) is the new phone book. It’s where users go to find businesses. Instead of flipping through a heavy-crinkly brick of pages to find a phone number,  you can actually search and pick out companies by putting in a couple of keywords. To get your business listed on Google you need a website. The goal for most companies is to get their website on the first page of results.</p>
<p>To accomplish this requires a deft strategy that constantly evolves. Google’s system in ranking pages is top secret and constantly changes. However there are practices that do greatly affect page rank.</p>
<p>This includes:</p>
<ul>
<li>Using keywords that are appropriate for your industry (this can include products, services and brand names)</li>
<li>Good, focused writing (I can’t this stress enough. Don’t simply stuff keywords on the copy)</li>
<li>Having all of your pages link to each other (having a nav bar isn’t enough)</li>
<li>Getting other websites to link to your website</li>
<li>Letting people know you have a website!</li>
</ul>
<p>Of course there’s alot more that goes into SEO than just good keyword copy. If you’re ready to rumble on the digital landscape drop a line to your friendly neighborhood social media consultant.</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://435digital.com/blog/2010/09/07/seo-uh-what-are-you-talking-about/">Explaining SEO in Plain English</a> appeared first on <a href="http://435digital.com">435 Digital</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://435digital.com/blog/2010/09/07/seo-uh-what-are-you-talking-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
